Germline mutation rates and fine-scale recombination parameters in zebra finch

Le résumé fourni par la source

Most of our understanding of the fundamental processes of mutation and recombination stems from a handful of disparate model organisms and pedigree studies of mammals, with little known about other vertebrates. To gain a broader comparative perspective, we focused on the zebra finch (Taeniopygia castanotis), which, like other birds, differs from mammals in its karyotype (which includes many micro-chromosomes), in the mechanism by which recombination is directed to the genome, and in aspects of ontogenesis. We collected genome sequences from three generation pedigrees that provide information about 80 meioses, inferring 202 single-point de novo mutations, 1,088 crossovers, and 275 non-crossovers. On that basis, we estimated a sex-averaged mutation rate of 5.0 × 10-9 per base pair per generation, on par with mammals that have a similar generation time (~2-3 years). Also as in mammals, we found a paternal germline mutation bias at later stages of gametogenesis (of 1.7:1) but no discernible difference between sexes in early development. Examining recombination patterns, we found that the sex-averaged crossover rate on macro-chromosomes is 0.93 cM/Mb, with a pronounced enrichment of crossovers near telomeres. In contrast, non-crossover rates are more uniformly distributed. On micro-chromosomes, sex-averaged crossover rates are substantially higher (3.96 cM/Mb), in accordance with crossover homeostasis, and both crossover and non-crossover events are more uniformly distributed. At a finer scale, recombination events overlap CpG islands more often than expected by chance, as expected in the absence of PRDM9. Estimates of the degree of GC-biased gene conversion (59%), the mean non-crossover conversion tract length (~32 bp), and the non-crossover-to-crossover ratio (5.4:1) are all comparable to those reported in primates and mice. Therefore, properties of germline mutation and recombination resolutions remain similar over large phylogenetic distances.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.