Reliability of CT, DECT, and MRI for the diagnosis of hemorrhagic transformation after thrombectomy
Rattachement africain : fr, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Computed Tomography (CT) is the main modality used for the diagnosis and classification of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after thrombectomy, however its reliability has shown limitations. Dual-energy CT (DECT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been suggested to enhance the reliability of HT detection and classification, but direct three-way comparison of these modalities is lacking. To measure and compare the reliability of CT, DECT and MRI for the diagnosis, classification, and therapeutic consequences of HT after thrombectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2017 and September 2019, 66 of 324 patients included in the BP-TARGET trial underwent CT, DECT and MRI scans within 36 h after thrombectomy. Seven readers, including three neurologists, two diagnostic, and two interventional neuroradiologists independently reviewed the images. They were asked for each patient and each imaging modality to score the presence of a hemorrhagic transformation (of any type), the type of hemorrhagic transformation according to the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS), and whether they would start the patient on antiplatelet based on the imaging finding. The readers repeated the same readings 1 month later. Interrater and intrarater agreement were measured using Kappa statistics. RESULTS: There were frequent discrepancies between CT, DECT and MRI scans evaluations. The use of MRI led to an increased rate of HT diagnosis compared to CT and DECT scans. Interrater agreement for ECASS classification was only fair-to-moderate for all three imaging modalities but improved to a substantial level after dichotomization into 0/HI1/HI2 versus PH1/PH2. The interrater agreement for the decision to start antiplatelet therapy was substantial only with CT (κ = 0.636 [0.577-0.694]) and remained moderate with MRI and DECT. CONCLUSION: In our study, the imaging modality influenced the diagnosis and classification of HT, the management of antiplatelet therapy, and the interrater and intrarater agreement. These findings may guide the choice of imaging modality in research or clinical settings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Reliability of CT, DECT, and MRI for the diagnosis of hemorrhagic transformation after thrombectomy
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Fondation de Rothschild pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
Inserm pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte-Anne pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Université Paris Cité pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Sorbonne Paris Cité pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Hôpital Lariboisière pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
FHU Neurovasc pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropsychopharmacologie pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Ottawa Hospital Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Fondation de Rothschild, Inserm et Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.