TGFBR3 dependent mechanism of TGFB2 in smooth muscle cell differentiation and implications for TGFB2-related aortic aneurysm.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Pathogenic variants in canonical transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling genes predispose patients to thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD), predominantly in aortic root. Although TAAD pathogenesis associated with TGFβ receptor defects is well characterized, distinct and redundant mechanisms of TGFβ isoforms in TAAD incidence and severity remain elusive. OBJECTIVE: Here we examined the biological role of TGFB2 in smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation and investigated how TGFB2 defects can lead to regional TAAD manifestations. METHODS: To characterize the role of TGFB2 in SMC differentiation and function, we employed human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived SMC differentiation, CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, three-dimensional SMC constructs, and human aortic tissue samples. RESULTS: Despite the similar effects of different TGFβ isoforms on hiPSC-derived SMC differentiation, siRNA experiments revealed that TGFB2 distinctively displays TGFBR3 dependence for signal transduction, an understudied TGFβ receptor in TAAD. Molecular evaluation of different thoracic aorta regions suggested TGFB2 and TGFBR3 enrichment in the aortic root tunica media. TGFB2 haploinsufficiency (TGFB2KO/+) and TGFB2 neutralization impaired the differentiation of second heart field-derived SMCs. TGFBR3KO/KO prevented the molecular rescue of TGFB2KO/+ by TGFB2 supplementation indicating the involvement of TGFBR3 in TGFB2-mediated SMC differentiation. Lastly, a missense TGFB2 variant (TGFB2G276R/+) caused mechanical defects in SMC tissue ring constructs that were rescued by TGFB2 supplementation or genetic correction. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests the distinct regulation and action of TGFB2 in SMCs populating the aortic root, while redundant activities of TGFβ isoforms provide implications about the milder TAAD aggressiveness of pathogenic TGFB2 variants.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.