Clinical Characteristics and Long‐Term Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Pediatric Achalasia
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pediatric achalasia and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are not well investigated. This study aimed to examine the clinical characteristics of pediatric achalasia and evaluate the long-term outcomes of POEM. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study across 14 high-volume centers, comparing the clinical characteristics of children (aged < 18 years) diagnosed with achalasia to those of adults (aged < 65 years). The POEM procedures and outcomes were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: ; p < 0.001). However, children exhibited less esophageal dilation (46.0% vs. 64.1%; p = 0.013) and higher lower esophageal sphincter pressure (37.3 vs. 29.9 mmHg; p = 0.002). Notably, a significant failure to thrive was not observed in the pediatric group. The POEM procedure time was shorter for children compared to adults (58.0 vs. 83.0 min; p < 0.001). Clinical success rates were not significant between the two groups. Over the 5-year follow-up period, children had a lower incidence of reflux esophagitis following POEM compared to adults (11.0% vs. 26.4%; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric achalasia is rare and typically presents with early-stage manometric and esophagogastric features, along with severe systemic symptoms requiring an early diagnosis. POEM is a durable and effective treatment for pediatric achalasia, offering advantages such as shorter procedural times and a lower incidence of postprocedure reflux compared to adults.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical Characteristics and Long‐Term Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Pediatric Achalasia
- Date Crossref
- 27/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.