An assessment of evidence to inform best practice for the communication of acute venous thromboembolism diagnosis: a scoping review
Rattachement africain : us, nl, ca, ir, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Physician communication with patients is a key aspect of excellent care. Scant evidence exists to inform best practice for physician communication in patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, collectively referred to as venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objectives: The aim of this study was to summarize the existing literature on best practices for communication between healthcare providers and patients newly diagnosed with VTE. Methods: We performed a scoping review to report existing literature on best practices for physician-patient communication and the diagnosis and management of acute VTE. Manuscripts on communication between healthcare professionals and patients presenting with acute VTE and acute vascular disease presentations that included atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome were identified. Two authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility and a consensus determined article inclusion. The manuscripts were further categorized into 2 categories: best practices in communication and unmet needs in communication. Data aggregation was achieved by a modified thematic synthesis. Results: Among 345 initial publications, 22 manuscripts met inclusion criteria, with 11 addressing VTE, 5 pulmonary embolism, 4 deep vein thrombosis, 1 atrial fibrillation, and 1 acute coronary syndrome. Eleven manuscripts addressed communication of VTE diagnosis, while 12 focused on communication of VTE treatment. Eleven manuscripts identified unmet communication needs, and 14 addressed best practices. Our review showed that good communication enhanced satisfaction, while suboptimal communication was associated with emotional, cognitive, behavioral, social, and health systems adverse effects. Conclusion: Scant literature guides best practices for communicating VTE diagnosis and treatment. Further research is necessary to establish practices for improving communication with VTE patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An assessment of evidence to inform best practice for the communication of acute venous thromboembolism diagnosis: a scoping review
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Augusta University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Leiden University Medical Center Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Hemostasis pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
University of Ottawa Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Queen's University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Lincoln pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Utah Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Medical College of Georgia pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Queens University Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Vasculearn Network pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Vascular Disease and Thrombosis Research Center pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
Augusta University, Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Hemostasis — Leiden University Medical Center et Department of Medicine — University of Ottawa, avec 8 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.