Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : my. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Educators have differing perception on the definition and conceptualization of clinical reasoning. Even though clinical reasoning is important in making a sound diagnosis and reducing diagnostic error, educators proved to be a barrier in teaching clinical reasoning due to the lack of awareness of their own reasoning process. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to investigate the perception and understanding of pre-clinical and clinical educators on what clinical reasoning entails, their experience, and educational strategies in teaching clinical reasoning. METHOD: A semi-structured interview was conducted with fifteen educators encompassing pre-clinical (basic science, laboratory-based) and clinical (surgical-based, medical-based, community-based and emergency medicine) educators. The transcribed interview data was then analysed thematically. RESULTS: Eight main themes were identified. Knowledge and experience were seen as important components in developing clinical reasoning. It was possible to teach clinical reasoning although there were some difficulties thus the need to have a train-the-trainer programme. Early introduction of clinical reasoning with its incorporation in various teaching and learning method; and the involvement of technological advances were also mentioned by the participants. However, pre-clinical educators did not perceive the importance of these technological advances. Role of educators; cognitive and non-cognitive attributes were also important in developing clinical reasoning. CONCLUSION: The perception and understanding of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning did not really differ. They believed that clinical reasoning can be taught, and a train-the-trainer program may be of immeasurable benefit.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study
Date Crossref
21/03/2025
Éditeur
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical Education

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.