Public Health Emergency Response and Recovery in Limited Resource Setting: Lesson learned from Hanang District Floods and Landslide in Tanzania
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: In December 2023, floods and landslides in Hanang District, Northern Tanzania, caused severe casualties, infrastructure damage, and community displacement. We describe the public health emergency response and lessons learnt during this disaster to guide future mitigations. METHODS: Retrospective data collection during the disaster was made through quantitative (description of casualties) and qualitative (interviews and focus groups) approaches to provide insights into psychosocial support, coordination, and other response pillars. Microsoft Excel (2019) was used for quantitative data analysis, and MAX Qualitative Data Analysis was used to manage qualitative data. RESULTS: Soft tissue injuries, bruises, and lacerations were the most common (60.43%), with 87.77% of casualties recovering and a notable fatality rate of 12.23%. Mental health and psychosocial support reached over 3300 individuals, offering depression assessments and family reconnections. Establishing a dual-level public health response team and implementing the Incident Management System demonstrated the country's response efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The public health emergency response to the 2023 floods and landslides in Hanang District was largely effective. This demonstrated strong coordination, capacity, and resilience of Tanzania health system; however, the fatality rate highlighted a need for further investment to improve future disaster prevention, preparedness, and response.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Public Health Emergency Response and Recovery in Limited Resource Setting: Lesson learned from Hanang District Floods and Landslide in Tanzania
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.