Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Screening Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: This retrospective study investigated the usefulness of the EW10-EG01 artificial intelligence (AI) application for screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Methodology: A total of 7,655 subjects (4,863 men, 2,792 women; mean age 54.9±10.1 years) who underwent EGD during a medical checkup were enrolled in the study. The number of diagnosed upper gastrointestinal tumors was compared between EGD examinations performed with and without the AI system. Results: EGD examinations with and without the AI system were performed on 3,841 and 3,814 subjects, respectively. Biopsy procedures were more frequently performed, and examination time was longer in EGD with AI applications than in those without. Upper gastrointestinal tumors diagnosed by EGD with and without AI were 39 (1.02%) and 24 (0.63%), respectively (P = 0.062). There was a significant difference in the detection rate of esophageal and gastric tumors between EGD with (30, 0.78%) and without (14, 0.37%) the AI system (P = 0.017). When endoscopists were divided into three groups based on their experience with the EW10-EG01 application, higher detection rates of esophageal and gastric tumors were observed in each group when using EGD with AI. Conclusions: Usage of the EW10-EG01 AI system may be useful for screening EGD due to the increased esophageal and gastric tumor detection rate.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Screening Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
- Date Crossref
- 02/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Shimane Prefectural Institute of Public Health and Environmental Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Shimane University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Health Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Faculty of Medicine Second Department of Internal Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Shimane Prefectural Institute of Public Health and Environmental Sciences, Shimane University et Health Center, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.