Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Exploring the causal influence of 731 immune cells on 4 different glaucoma subtypes using a two-sample mendelian randomization method

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

In the pathological progression of glaucoma, damage to the ocular nerves and associated tissue alterations can induce a systemic immune response, leading to the activation of various immune cells such as T cells, B cells, and macrophages. This complex process has the potential to intensify the clinical manifestations of glaucoma. Utilising Mendelian randomisation methods to identify the types and quantities of activated immune cells in different glaucoma-related lesions could provide robust evidence for the development of novel immunomodulators and immunosuppressants tailored to specific types of glaucoma, thereby facilitating personalised treatment strategies. We used five Mendelian randomisation (MR) methods-inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, simple model, weighted median, and weighted mediation model - to assess causal relationships between immune cells and four glaucoma subtypes: neovascular glaucoma (NVG), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), primary closed-angle glaucoma (PACG), and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). IVW aggregated causal estimates using Wald ratios and variance-weighted meta-analysis. MR-Egger considered horizontal pleiotropy under the InSIDE assumption. The weighted median model required ≥ 50% valid instrumental variables (IVs) for robust inference, while the weighted mediation model adjusted for SNP correlations. The simple model provided additional insight into causality. Glaucoma GWAS data were obtained from FinnGen ( https://finngen.gitbook.io/documentation/ ). Summary statistics for immune cell phenotypes (GWAS IDs: GCST90001391-GCST90002121) were obtained from the GWAS catalogue ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/studies/GCST90002121 ). The study has identified a causal relationship between various immune cells and different types of glaucoma. It was found that 21 different types of immune cells had a causal relationship with NVG, 37 types of immune cells had a causal relationship with POAG, 40 different types of immune cells had a causal relationship with PACG, and 24 different types of immune cells had a causal relationship with NTG.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Exploring the causal influence of 731 immune cells on 4 different glaucoma subtypes using a two-sample mendelian randomization method
Date Crossref
18/02/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé

Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine et Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGlaucoma and retinal disordersGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.