Ex vivo T-lymphopoiesis assays assisting corrective treatment choice for genetically undefined T-lymphocytopenia
Rattachement africain : gb, ca, fr, nl, ch, be, at, au, dk, cz, it, il, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Persistent selective T-lymphocytopenia is found both in SCID and congenital athymia. Without molecular diagnosis, it is challenging to determine whether HCT or thymus transplantation ought to be performed. Ex vivo T-lymphopoiesis assays have been proposed to assist clinical decision-making for genetically undefined patients. We investigated 20 T-lymphocytopenic patients, including 13 patients awaiting first-line treatment and 7 patients with failed immune reconstitution after previous HCT or thymus transplantation. Whilst developmental blocks in ex vivo T-lymphopoiesis indicated hematopoietic cell-intrinsic defects, successful T-lymphocyte differentiation required careful interpretation, in conjunction with clinical status, immunophenotyping, and genetic investigations. Of the 20 patients, 13 proceeded to treatment, with successful immune reconstitution observed in 4 of the 6 patients post-HCT and 4 of the 7 patients after thymus transplantation, the latter including two patients who had previously undergone HCT. Whilst further validation and standardization are required, we conclude that assessing ex vivo T-lymphopoiesis during the diagnostic pathway for genetically undefined T-lymphocytopenia improves patient outcomes by facilitating corrective treatment choice.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ex vivo T-lymphopoiesis assays assisting corrective treatment choice for genetically undefined T-lymphocytopenia
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.