P-1033. Post-transplant Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Invasive Fungal Infections Prior vs. After the Emergence of SARS-CoV2
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a serious complication in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), leading to increased mortality and graft failure. Given changes in care associated with pandemic conditions and potential compounding effects of COVID-19 infection, we sought to determine whether the emergence of SARS-CoV2 contributed to a rise in adverse transplant outcomes associated with IFIs. Methods We performed a retrospective study of adult KTRs transplanted at Johns Hopkins from 2012-2018 with follow up through 5/2023. IFI diagnoses were based on EORTC/MSGERC criteria. If a patient had more than one IFI, the date of first IFI served as the index exposure. KTRs with and without IFIs were matched 1:1 on time-post-KT. We followed patients until all-cause graft loss (ACGL), a composite outcome of graft failure and mortality, and estimated cumulative incidence of ACGL prior vs. after emergence of SARS-CoV2 in 2/2020. We then determined whether the association between IFI and ACGL varied before vs during SARS-CoV2 pandemic using Cox regression with an interaction term and adjusting for age, transplant risk, and cardiovascular disease.Table 2.First post-transplant invasive fungal infection among kidney transplant recipients prior vs. post emergence of SARS-CoV2 Results Among 1453 KTRs, 79 (5.4%) had proven/probable IFIs of which 12 occurred after emergence of SARS-CoV2 (Table 1). Yeast caused the majority of IFIs (50/79) over the study period, but mold (5/12) and yeast (6/12) were equally represented among IFIs occurring after the emergence of SARS-CoV2 (Table 2). Prior to the pandemic, ACGL occurred in 66% (44/67) of KTRs with IFIs compared to 31% (414/1338) of KTRs without IFIs (log-rank p < 0.001). During the pandemic, ACGL occurred in 75% (9/12) of KTRs with IFIs compared to 31% of KTRs without IFIs (log-rank p < 0.001) (Fig 1). KTRs with IFIs had a 2-fold greater risk of ACGL (aHR 2.05, 95% CI 1.17-3.57, p = 0.012) prior to the pandemic and a 5.5-fold greater risk of ACGL (aHR 5.54, 95% CI 1.17-26.24, p < 0.01) during the pandemic. The risk of ACGL associated with IFIs was significantly different after the emergence of SARS-CoV2 (p-interaction term < 0.001; Fig 2).Figure 1.ACGL-free survival of KTR with IFIs vs. without IFIs Conclusion KTRs with IFIs had higher rates of ACGL during the pandemic, and molds constituted a greater proportion of the IFIs during the pandemic. The emergence of SARS-CoV2 seems to have shifted the epidemiology of IFIs among KTRs, leading to increased ACGL.Figure 2.ACGL-free survival of KTR with IFIs prior vs. after emergence of SARS-CoV2 Disclosures Nitipong Permpalung, MD, MPH, CareDx: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|ClearView: Advisor/Consultant|IMMY Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pearl Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|Pulmicide: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P-1033. Post-transplant Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Invasive Fungal Infections Prior vs. After the Emergence of SARS-CoV2
- Date Crossref
- 29/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Johns Hopkins University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Johns Hopkins Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Johns Hopkins University et Johns Hopkins Medicine.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.