Impact of ECPELLA support on 1-year outcomes and myocardial damage in patients with acute myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock: A single-center retrospective observational study

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a vital mechanical circulatory support for treating patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). VA-ECMO can improve end-organ perfusion; however, it increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, resulting in further myocardial damage. ECPELLA, a combination of VA-ECMO and Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) treatments, is an emerging modality to optimize end-organ perfusion and LV unloading. The impact of ECPELLA in refractory CS has not been established. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECPELLA on acute-phase LV damage and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and refractory CS and compare them with those of VA-ECMO with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included 90 consecutive patients with AMI and refractory CS who received VA-ECMO between January 2012 and December 2022. Of these, 44 and 46 received ECPELLA and VA-ECMO with IABP, respectively. We assessed the serum creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) levels and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics and time from onset to reperfusion between the two groups. Compared with VA-ECMO with IABP, ECPELLA produced lower peak CK-MB levels (265 IU/L vs. 500 IU/L, p = 0.016) and a smaller area under the curve of CK-MB during the first 3 days (274 IU/L × d vs. 534 IU/L × d, p = 0.025). ECPELLA was associated with significantly lower 1-year mortality (64% vs 91%; p = 0.001). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that ECPELLA was inversely and independently associated with 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.64; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ECPELLA may offer myocardial protection and be associated with improved 1-year mortality in patients with AMI and refractory CS. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations and better understand the potential benefits of ECPELLA in this population.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.