Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Disagreement on foundational principles of biological aging

61Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
62Institutions déclarées
12Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

To gain insight into how researchers of aging perceive the process they study, we conducted a survey among experts in the field. While highlighting some common features of aging, the survey exposed broad disagreement on the foundational issues. What is aging? What causes it? When does it begin? What constitutes rejuvenation? Not only was there no consensus on these and other core questions, but none of the questions received a majority opinion-even regarding the need for consensus itself. Despite many researchers believing they understand aging, their understanding diverges considerably. Importantly, as different processes are labeled as "aging" by researchers, different experimental approaches are prioritized. The survey shed light on the need to better define which aging processes this field should target and what its goals are. It also allowed us to categorize contemporary views on aging and rejuvenation, revealing critical, yet largely unanswered, questions that appear disconnected from the current research focus. Finally, we discuss ways to address the disagreement, which we hope will ultimately aid progress in the field.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Disagreement on foundational principles of biological aging
Date Crossref
28/11/2024
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Broad InstituteBrigham and Women's HospitalHarvard UniversityParticulate Solid Research (United States)Boston UniversityColumbia UniversityUniversity of UtahBuck Institute for Research on AgingSutter HealthCalifornia Pacific Medical CenterUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical SchoolJackson LaboratoryStanford UniversityUniversity of CologneCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated DiseasesMax Planck Institute for Biology of AgeingIo Therapeutics (United States)Howard Hughes Medical InstituteMcGovern Institute for Brain ResearchMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversity of FloridaMedical University of South CarolinaAltos LabsUniversity of RochesterVIR Biotechnology (United States)Scripps Research InstituteUtrecht UniversityWhitehead Institute for Biomedical ResearchTohoku UniversityHUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and ControlJohns Hopkins UniversityJohns Hopkins MedicineEnzo Life Sciences (United States)Calico Life SciencesEdinburgh Cancer ResearchArizona State UniversityNortheastern UniversityTexas Tech UniversityUniversity of PittsburghCenter for Systems BiologyNew York UniversityDalhousie UniversityTufts UniversityJean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on AgingNational Space AgencyUniversity of ZurichHarvard University PressCoherus BioSciences (United States)University of CopenhagenTranslational Genomics Research InstituteNorthwestern UniversityLung InstituteJuntendo UniversityVanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstUniversity College DublinNational University of SingaporeEnvironmental Protection AgencyInstitute on AgingInsilicos (United States)Insilico Medicine (United States)

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsSpaceflight effects on biology

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.