Viral mimicry redirects immunosuppressed colorectal tumour landscapes towards a proinflammatory and CMS1-like regenerative state
Rattachement africain : gb, ie, bd. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In colorectal cancer (CRC), tumours classified as consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) have the worst prognosis and derive negligible benefit from chemotherapy. We previously described how repressed interferon-related signalling is associated with increased relapse in CMS4 tumours. Although the viral mimetic polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid, poly(I:C), can reduce liver metastasis in vivo, the initial phenotypic changes that underpin its anti-metastatic response remain poorly described, particularly in the immunosuppressed CMS4 tumour microenvironment. Here we characterise lineage-specific anti-metastatic responses induced by poly(I:C), including acute macrophage polarisation and a novel CMS1-like regenerative stem cell state, which drive pro-inflammatory microenvironmental changes in CRC. These insights enabled the development of tractable biomarkers that identify an "immune-warm" patient subset most likely to respond to poly(I:C), enriched for mismatch-repair proficient (pMMR), anti-inflammatory macrophages and CMS4-like features. The viral mimetic poly(I:C) offers a tailored treatment option for poor-prognostic tumours, by reprogramming stem cell states and activation of an innate-adaptive anti-metastatic response.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Viral mimicry redirects immunosuppressed colorectal tumour landscapes towards a proinflammatory and CMS1-like regenerative state
- Date Crossref
- 26/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.