Open-source electrophilic fragment screening platform to identify chemical starting points for UCHL1 covalent inhibitors

Le résumé fourni par la source

Target-based screening of covalent fragment libraries with mass spectrometry has emerged as a powerful strategy to identify chemical starting points for small molecule inhibitors or find new binding pockets on proteins of interest. These libraries span diverse chemical space with a modest number of compounds. Screening covalent fragments against purified protein targets reduces the demands on the mass spectrometer with respect to absolute throughput, detection limit, and dynamic range. Given these relaxed analytical requirements, we sought to develop an open-source, medium-throughput mass spectrometry system for target-based covalent fragment screening. Our platform comprises automated, dual LC desalting columns integrated with electrospray ionization for rapid sample introduction and mass spectrometry detection. The system is operated through a simple Python graphical user interface running on commodity microcontroller boards which allow integration with diverse liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry instruments. We provide scripts for fragment pooling, construction of sample batches, along with routines for data processing and visualization. The system enables primary screening of ∼10,000 covalent fragments per day in pooled format. In a proof-of-concept study we executed primary and secondary screens to identify 27 hit fragments against UCHL1, a deubiquitinating enzyme that is emerging as a drug target of interest across multiple clinical indications. We validated and triaged these covalent compounds through a series of orthogonal biochemical and chemoproteomic assays. The most promising chloroacetamide covalent fragment inhibited UCHL1 activity in vitro (IC 50 < 5 µM) and exhibited dose-dependent binding along with good selectivity against 57 cellular DUBs as quantified by activity-based protein profiling.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.