A Prevalent TMEM260 Deletion Causes Conotruncal Heart Defects, Including Truncus Arteriosus
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Conotruncal heart defects are severe congenital malformations of the outflow tract, including truncus arteriosus (TA) and double-outlet right ventricle (DORV). TA is a severe congenital heart disease (CHD) in which the main arterial outflow tract of the heart fails to separate. We recently reported TMEM260 (NM_017799.4), c.1617del (p.Trp539Cysfs*9), as a major cause of TA in the Japanese population (TMEM260 Keio-Tohoku variant) comparable to the prevalence of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, which accounts for 12%-35% of TA. However, no other major causes of TA have not been identified. Here, we report a family that included a TA patient and a DORV patient, harboring the compound heterozygous variants of TMEM260, a 7066-bp deletion encompassing exons 6-7 and c.1393C > T, p.(Gln465*). The allele frequency of the 7066-bp deletion was particularly high in the Japanese population (0.17%). Based on the allele frequency of this deletion and c.1617del (0.36%) in the Japanese population, TMEM260 variants might be associated with more than half of the Japanese patients with TA. This study showed that TMEM260 pathogenic variants might be the most common cause of TA in the Japanese population and could explain the wide spectrum of phenotypes associated with TMEM260-related CHD, including DORV, demonstrating the usefulness of genetic testing in Japanese patients with TA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- A Prevalent <scp><i>TMEM260</i></scp> Deletion Causes Conotruncal Heart Defects, Including Truncus Arteriosus
- Date Crossref
- 19/10/2024
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.