Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Uncertainty quantification for severe-accident reactor modelling: Results and conclusions of the MUSA reactor applications work package

18Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
26Institutions déclarées
17Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : nl, de, bg, cn, be, es, ca, it, ua, us, fr, gb, jp, kr, lt, ch, fi. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

• Challenges of BEPU method in Severe Accident modelling are explored. • Uncertainty analysis broadens the understanding of Severe Accident sequences • Applications demonstrate the level of readiness for BEPU in Severe Accident modelling. • A large data base of BEPU reactor applications is created in MUSA. The recently completed Horizon-2020 project “Management and Uncertainties of Severe Accidents (MUSA)” has reviewed uncertainty sources and Uncertainty Quantification methodology for assessing Severe Accidents (SA), and has made a substantial effort at stimulating uncertainty applications in predicting the radiological Source Term of reactor and Spent Fuel Pool accident scenarios. The key motivation of the project has been to bring the advantages of the Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty approach to the field of Severe Accident modelling. With respect to deterministic analyses, expected gains are avoiding adopting conservative assumptions, identifying uncertainty bands of estimates, and gaining insights into dominating uncertain parameters. Also, the benefits for understanding and improving Accident Management were to be explored. The reactor applications brought together a large group of participants that set out to apply uncertainty analysis (UA) within their field of SA modelling expertise – in particular reactor types, but also SA code used (ASTEC, MELCOR, MAAP, RELAP/SCDAPSIM), uncertainty quantification tools used (DAKOTA, SUSA, URANIE, self-developed tools based on Python code), detailed accident scenarios, and in some cases SAM actions. The setting up of the analyses, challenges faced during that phase, and solutions explored, are described in Brumm et al. ANE 191 (2023). This paper synthesizes the reactor-application work at the end of the project. Analyses of 23 partners are presented in different categories, depending on whether their main goal is/are (i) uncertainty bands of simulation results; (ii) the understanding of dominating uncertainties in specific sub-models of the SA code; (iii) improving the understanding of specific accident scenarios, with or without the application of SAM actions; or, (iv) a demonstration of the tools used and developed, and of the capability to carry out an uncertainty analysis in the presence of the challenges faced. A cross-section of the partners’ results is presented and briefly discussed, to provide an overview of the work done, and to encourage accessing and studying the project deliverables that are open to the public. Furthermore, the partners’ experiences made during the project have been evaluated and are presented as good practice recommendations. The paper ends with conclusions on the level of readiness of UA in SA modelling, on the determination of governing uncertainties, and on the analysis of SAM actions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Uncertainty quantification for severe-accident reactor modelling: Results and conclusions of the MUSA reactor applications work package
Date Crossref
01/02/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Joint Research Centre European Commission pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • China Nuclear Power Technology Research Institute (China) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise
  • Belsim (Belgium) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • National Agency for New Technologies ENEA - Agenzia Nazionale per le nuove Tecnologie pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Energostal (Ukraine) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise
  • Software (Spain) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise

European Commission — Joint Research Centre, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology et Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, avec 9 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Nuclear reactor physics and engineeringNuclear Engineering Thermal-HydraulicsNuclear Materials and Properties

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.