Epidural spinal cord recordings (ESRs): sources of neural-appearing artifact in stimulation evoked compound action potentials

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Objective. Evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) measured during epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can help elucidate fundamental mechanisms for the treatment of pain and inform closed-loop control of SCS. Previous studies have used ECAPs to characterize neural responses to various neuromodulation therapies and have demonstrated that ECAPs are highly prone to multiple sources of artifact, including post-stimulus pulse capacitive artifact, electromyography (EMG) bleed-through, and motion artifact. However, a thorough characterization has yet to be performed for how these sources of artifact may contaminate recordings within the temporal window commonly used to determine activation of A-beta fibers in a large animal model. Approach. We characterized sources of artifacts that can contaminate the recording of ECAPs in an epidural SCS swine model using the Abbott Octrode™ lead. Main results. Spinal ECAP recordings can be contaminated by capacitive artifact, short latency EMG from nearby muscles of the back, and motion artifact. The capacitive artifact can appear nearly identical in duration and waveshape to evoked A-beta responses. EMG bleed-through can have phase shifts across the electrode array, similar to the phase shift anticipated by propagation of an evoked A-beta fiber response. The short latency EMG is often evident at currents similar to those needed to activate A-beta fibers associated with the treatment of pain. Changes in CSF between the cord and dura, and motion induced during breathing created a cyclic oscillation in all evoked components of recorded ECAPs. Significance. Controls must be implemented to separate neural signal from sources of artifact in SCS ECAPs. We suggest experimental procedures and reporting requirements necessary to disambiguate underlying neural response from these confounds. These data are important to better understand the framework for epidural spinal recordings (ESRs), with components such as ECAPs, EMG, and artifacts, and have important implications for closed-loop control algorithms to account for transient motion such as postural changes and cough.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.