Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on lower limb complications: a mendelian randomization perspective

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: While Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in managing diabetes and reducing cardiovascular risk, concerns about their association with lower limb complications, including, osteomyelitis, ulcers, and peripheral artery disease (PAD), persist. This study employs Mendelian Randomization (MR) to assess the causal relationship between SGLT2 inhibitors and these lower limb safety outcomes. Methods: A two-sample drug-target MR approach was used, complemented by a one-sample MR and genetic association analysis. Six SNPs were selected as instrumental variables to proxy the effect of SGLT2 inhibition. Primary outcomes were major limb safety outcomes, including osteomyelitis, lower limb ulcers, PAD, and cellulitis. The primary analytical method was the generalized inverse variance-weighted (IVW) approach, along with several sensitivity analyses. Results: The MR analysis indicated no significant causal association between genetically proxied SGLT2 inhibition and most of the studied lower limb safety outcomes. However, a significant association with PAD was observed, necessitating careful interpretation due to discrepancies between IVW and MR-Egger results. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings, showing little evidence of heterogeneity or directional pleiotropy. Conclusion: This study suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors may not be significantly associated with an increased risk of most lower limb safety outcomes, including osteomyelitis, lower limb ulcers, and cellulitis, in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the complex relationship with PAD highlights the need for further research. These findings contribute to the understanding of the safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors, supporting their continued use in diabetes management while underlining the importance of continuous safety monitoring.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.