No replicating evidence for anti‐amyloid‐β autoantibodies in cerebral amyloid angiopathy‐related inflammation
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Elevated levels of anti-amyloid-β (anti-Aβ) autoantibodies in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been proposed as a diagnostic biomarker for cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-RI). We aimed to independently validate the immunoassay for quantifying these antibodies and evaluate its diagnostic value for CAA-RI. METHODS: We replicated the immunoassay to detect CSF anti-Aβ autoantibodies using CSF from CAA-RI patients and non-CAA controls with unrelated disorders and further characterized its performance. Moreover, we conducted a literature review of CAA-RI case reports to investigate neuropathological and CSF evidence of the nature of the inflammatory reaction in CAA-RI. RESULTS: = 0.51, p = 0.02). Assay levels were not elevated in CAA-RI patients (n = 6) compared to non-CAA controls (n = 20; p = 0.64). Literature review indicated only occasional presence of B-lymphocytes and plasma cells (i.e., antibody-producing cells), alongside the abundant presence of activated microglial cells, T-cells, and other monocyte lineage cells. CSF analysis did not convincingly indicate intrathecal IgG production. INTERPRETATION: We were unable to reproduce the reported elevation of anti-Aβ autoantibody concentration in CSF of CAA-RI patients. Our findings instead support nonspecific detection of IgG levels in CSF by the assay. Reviewed CAA-RI case reports suggested a widespread cerebral inflammatory reaction. In conclusion, our findings do not support anti-Aβ autoantibodies as a diagnostic biomarker for CAA-RI.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- No replicating evidence for anti‐amyloid‐β autoantibodies in cerebral amyloid angiopathy‐related inflammation
- Date Crossref
- 13/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.