Individual Differences in Visual vs. Semantic Neural Reactivation: Evidence from Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory (SDAM)

Le résumé fourni par la source

Visual memory is intricately linked to the reinstatement of low-level visual features, such as edges and luminosity, within the early visual cortex. However, individuals with Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory (SDAM) cannot vividly recollect autobiographical experiences yet display normal everyday functioning. We hypothesized that such individuals would show reduced reliance on low-level visual features during a challenging visual recognition task due to impaired communication between the posterior hippocampus and early visual cortex. Instead, they would depend on semantic features for memory performance. Two methods were used to measure the content of memory derived from fMRI data collected at encoding and retrieval: one directly measuring feature-specific neural reactivation within the hippocampus and other cortical regions, and another modeling top-down inference to assess the influence of semantic-based recall on reactivation within the early visual cortex. In accord with prior findings, recognition accuracy in non-SDAM individuals was linked to low-level visual reactivation within the early visual cortex and posterior hippocampus. As predicted, this association was diminished in SDAM individuals, whose recognition accuracy was instead linked to semantic-based reactivation. Additionally, non-SDAM individuals exhibited communication of low-level visual information between the early visual cortex and hippocampus, while SDAM individuals showed communication of semantic information. Given that SDAM participants’ performance on the visual memory task was equivalent to non-SDAM subjects, our findings suggest that SDAM individuals successfully compensate for impaired low-level visual memory through semantic recall and highlight the essential role of feature-specific reactivation measures in identifying distinct neural pathways to memory performance.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.