Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 preprint

Analysis of more than 400,000 women provides case-control evidence for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classification

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
99Institutions déclarées
21Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cy, no, au, gb, us, ca, de, dk, es, se, it, sg, my, pl, ru, fi, gr, pk, nl, co, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Clinical genetic testing identifies variants causal for hereditary cancer, information that is used for risk assessment and clinical management. Unfortunately, some variants identified are of uncertain clinical significance (VUS), complicating patient management. Case-control data is one evidence type used to classify VUS, and previous findings indicate that case-control likelihood ratios (LRs) outperform odds ratios for variant classification. As an initiative of the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) Analytical Working Group we analyzed germline sequencing data of BRCA1 and BRCA2 from 96,691 female breast cancer cases and 303,925 unaffected controls from three studies: the BRIDGES study of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility consortium, and the UK Biobank. We observed 11,227 BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, with 6,921 being coding, covering 23.4% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS in ClinVar and 19.2% of ClinVar curated (likely) benign or pathogenic variants. Case-control LR evidence was highly consistent with ClinVar assertions for (likely) benign or pathogenic variants; exhibiting 99.1% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity for BRCA1 and 92.2% sensitivity and 86.6% specificity for BRCA2 . This approach provides case-control evidence for 785 unclassified variants, that can serve as a valuable element for clinical classification.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Analysis of more than 400,000 women provides case-control evidence for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classification
Date Crossref
04/09/2024
Éditeur
openRxiv
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Cyprus Institute of Neurology and GeneticsOslo University HospitalQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteUniversity of CambridgeMayo Clinic in FloridaMayo Clinic in ArizonaNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMedical College of WisconsinAmerican Cancer SocietyMedizinische Hochschule HannoverUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen University HospitalGentofte HospitalDana-Farber Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahHuntsman Cancer InstituteEdinburgh Cancer ResearchComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de SantiagoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de SantiagoServicio Gallego de SaludIntermountain HealthcareUniversität HamburgGerman Cancer Research CenterHeidelberg UniversityUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity Cancer Center HamburgUniversity of Southern CaliforniaKarolinska InstitutetIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ScientificoIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleUniversity of PennsylvaniaBrigham and Women's HospitalHarvard UniversityManchester Academic Health Science CentreUniversity of ManchesterManchester University NHS Foundation TrustSt Mary's HospitalUniversitätsklinikum ErlangenComprehensive Cancer Center ErlangenUniversity of EdinburghFundación Pública Galega de Medicina XenómicaSpanish National Cancer Research CentreUniversity of PotsdamNational University of SingaporeNational University Health SystemUniversity of Nottingham Malaysia CampusCancer Research MalaysiaDr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical PharmacologyUniversity of TübingenCancer Research UK Manchester InstituteInternational Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversityUfa Institute of ChemistryJohanniter-Krankenhaus BonnDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsUniversity of OsloCity of HopeAgency for Science, Technology and ResearchGenome Institute of SingaporeKK Women's and Children's HospitalDuke-NUS Medical SchoolUniversity of WashingtonFred Hutch Cancer CenterUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopio University HospitalUniversity of California San DiegoHuman Longevity (United States)University Hospital of HeraklionThe University of MelbourneCancer Council VictoriaMonash HealthMonash UniversityBoston UniversityCedars-Sinai Medical CenterChicago Department of Public HealthUniversity of ChicagoShaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research CenterUniversity of ThessalyKing's College LondonLeiden University Medical CenterThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteOncode InstituteSingapore General HospitalSingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical CentreNational Cancer Centre SingaporeUniversity of MalayaPontificia Universidad JaverianaUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer CenterInsermUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-YvelinesCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des PopulationsThe University of Kansas Cancer CenterUniversity of California, Santa Cruz

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Genomics and Rare DiseasesBRCA gene mutations in cancerGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.