Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Centralized Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Study Number 2005: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Lung Cancer Surgery or Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Operable Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (VALOR)

9Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
24Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: The phase 3 Veterans Affairs Lung Cancer Surgery Or Stereotactic Radiotherapy study implemented centralized quality assurance (QA) to mitigate risks of protocol deviations. This report summarizes the quality and compliance of the first 100 participants treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in this study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A centralized QA program was developed to credential and monitor study sites to ensure standard-of-care lung SBRT treatments are delivered to participants. Requirements were adapted from protocols established by the National Cancer Institute's Image and Radiation Oncology Core, which provides oversight for clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute's National Clinical Trials Network. RESULTS: The first 100 lung SBRT treatment plans were reviewed from April 2017 to October 2022. Tumor contours were appropriate in all submissions. Planning target volume (PTV) expansions were less than the minimum 5 mm requirement in 2% of cases. Critical organ-at-risk structures were contoured accurately for the proximal bronchial tree, trachea, esophagus, spinal cord, and brachial plexus in 75%, 92%, 100%, 100%, and 95% of cases, respectively. Prescriptions were appropriate in 98% of cases; 2 central tumors were treated using a peripheral tumor dose prescription while meeting organ-at-risk constraints. PTV V100% (the percentage of target volume that receives 100% or more of the prescription) values were above the protocol-defined minimum of 94% in all but 1 submission. The median dose maximum (Dmax) within the PTV was 125.4% (105.8%-149.0%; SD ± 8.7%), where values reference the percentage of the prescription dose. High-dose conformality (ratio of the volume of the prescription isodose to the volume of the PTV) and intermediate-dose compactness [R50% (ratio of the volume of the half prescription isodose to the volume of the PTV) and D2cm (the maximum dose beyond a 2 cm expansion of the PTV expressed as a percentage of the prescription dose)] were acceptable or deviation acceptable in 100% and 94% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The first 100 participants randomized to SBRT in this study were appropriately treated without safety concerns. A response to the incorrect prescriptions led to preventative measures without further recurrences. The program was developed in a health care system without prior experience with a centralized radiation therapy QA program and may serve as a reference for other institutions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Centralized Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Study Number 2005: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Lung Cancer Surgery or Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Operable Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (VALOR)
Date Crossref
01/01/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Radiation Oncology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • VA Central California Health Care System pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Department of Radiation Oncology pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Jr. VA Hospital Edward Hines pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of New Mexico Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • VA Office of Research and Development pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • University of Illinois Chicago pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Oregon Health & Science University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • VA Portland Health Care System pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé

Department of Radiation Oncology — Virginia Commonwealth University, VA Central California Health Care System et Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, avec 9 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.