Prediction Model for Immunotherapy Efficacy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Alternative Splicing Sequencing Data

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Integrating immune checkpoint inhibitors with multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors presents an innovative and hopeful strategy in liver cancer treatment. Nonetheless, a degree of resistance to this treatment is noticeable in certain patients. Alternative splicing (AS) represents a common biological process that controls the variety of life functions via isoforms. Purpose: Investigating how gene AS affects the effectiveness of combined immunotherapy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Our retrospective examination focused on AS's effect on immune therapy effectiveness, utilizing accessible tissue sequencing and clinical records for HCC. For corroborating our results, we gathered samples of drug-resistant HCC tissue, nearby tissues, HCC tissue with high drug responsiveness, and healthy liver tissue from clinical studies. Results: The study revealed a link between the frequency of AS occurrences, the expression levels of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1, and the resistance to tumor medications. Our study detailed the AS occurrences in HCC, leading to the creation of a risk-assessment function and a predictive model using AS data. The results of our study revealed that the risk score effectively distinguished between various immune subtypes and the effectiveness of immune therapy. Additional examination of the chosen AS occurrences uncovered their effects on both the immune microenvironment and cellular immunity. Our investigation also delved into the regulatory framework of AS, uncovering the role of stringently controlled splicing factors in the emergence of tumors and the modulation of the body's immune response. Conclusions: Increased AS in HCC diminishes the efficacy of immunotherapy; conversely, more AS in peritumoral tissue elevates the likelihood of tumor immune evasion.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.