High Intraocular Pressure Is Independently Associated With New-Onset Systemic Hypertension Over a 10-Year Period
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Systemic hypertension (HT) is associated with the development of increased intraocular pressure (IOP), a risk factor for glaucoma. However, it remains unclear whether high IOP is a risk factor for HT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated 7,487 Japanese individuals (4,714 men, 2,773 women; mean [±SD] age 49±9 years) who underwent annual health checkups in 2006. Over the 10-year follow-up period, 1,232 (24.3%) men and 370 (11.5%) women developed new-onset HT, defined as initiation of antihypertensive drug treatment or blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg. After dividing IOP into tertiles (T1-T3), Cox proportional hazards analysis (adjusted for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, obesity, current smoking, alcohol consumption, family history of HT, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and diabetes and dyslipidemia diagnoses at baseline) revealed a significantly higher risk of newly developed HT in T3 (IOP ≥14 mmHg; hazard ratio 1.14; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.29; P=0.038) using T1 (IOP ≤11 mmHg) as the reference group. There was no significant interaction between sex and IOP tertile (P=0.153). A restricted cubic spline model showed a gradual but robust increase in the hazard ratio for new-onset HT with increasing IOP. CONCLUSIONS: High IOP is an independent risk factor for the development of HT over a 10-year period.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- High Intraocular Pressure Is Independently Associated With New-Onset Systemic Hypertension Over a 10-Year Period
- Date Crossref
- 25/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Japanese Circulation Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.