RDH5 and RLBP1-Associated Inherited Retinal Diseases: Refining the Spectrum of Stationary and Progressive Phenotypes
Rattachement africain : fr, it, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical, functional, and imaging characteristics in patients affected by inherited retinal diseases associated with RDH5 and RLBP1 gene variants, and to report novel genotype-phenotype correlations. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center cohort study. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with molecularly confirmed RLBP1-associated retinopathy and 5 with RDH5-associated retinopathy. Medical records were reviewed to obtain data on family history and ophthalmologic examinations, including retinal imaging and full-field electroretinography (ffERG). Genotype was determined by targeted next-generation sequencing followed by confirmation and familial segregation by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: /y (95% CI, -0.012 to -0.001; P = .02), without any significant difference between the two genotypes. Three unrelated patients homozygous for the c.361C>T p.(Arg121Trp) RLBP1 variant showed minimal impairment of both the rod and cone systems function on ffERG and absence of MA. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive MA in addition to congenital night blindness can be identified in adult patients with RDH5-associated retinopathy. Vice versa, hypomorphic RLBP1 variants may cause milder retinal phenotypes rather than the typical severe rod-cone dystrophy with MA. These findings could prove beneficial to improve the prognostication of patients and help in designing future interventional trials.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- RDH5 and RLBP1-Associated Inherited Retinal Diseases: Refining the Spectrum of Stationary and Progressive Phenotypes
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.