P.067 Pharmacological prophylaxis for chronic migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the comparative effectiveness of available pharmacological prophylaxis for migraines. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL up to October 2023 for trials that: (1) enrolled adults diagnosed with chronic migraine, and (2) randomized them to any prophylactic medication vs. another medication or placebo. We performed a random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis for patient-important outcomes. Results: We included 193 randomized trials. Compared to placebo, CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mean difference [MD] -1.7, 95%CI: -1.1 to -2.2), injection of botulinum toxin (MD -1.8, 95%CI: -0.7 to -2.9), calcium channel blockers (MD -1.8, 95%CI: -0.5 to -3.0), beta-blockers (MD -1.4, 95%CI: -0.2 to -2.6), and anticonvulsants (MD -1.1, 95%CI: -0.4 to -1.8) were among the most effective treatments in reducing average number of headache days per months. Anticonvulsants (Risk Ratio [RR] 2.3, 95%CI: 1.8 to 3.0), calcium channel blockers (RR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.1), and tricyclic antidepressants (RR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.8) showed the highest risk of discontinuation due to adverse events. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CGRP inhibitors, botulinum toxin, and beta-blockers may provide the greatest benefit, and tolerability, for reducing the frequency of migraine headaches.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.