P5. Impact Of Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach (LYMPHA) On Postoperative Complication Rates In Immediate Prosthetic Based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Rattachement africain : us, bb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventative Healing Approach (LYMPHA) is performed at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) reducing rate of lymphedema (LE). It is often performed with immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction (IBBR). We aimed to determine whether the additional LYMPHA procedure impacts surgical outcomes of IBBR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included breast cancer patients undergoing Mastectomy with IBBR (with and without ALND with LYMPHA (April 2021 -May 2023). Complications recorded were hematoma, seroma, minor infection (requiring oral antibiotics), major infection (requiring intravenous antibiotics), wound dehiscence, mastectomy flap necrosis, implant exposure, and readmission within 90 days of surgery. RESULTS: 77 patients met inclusion criteria: 48% (n=37) had IBBR with LYMPHA and 52% (n=40) had IBBR without LYMPHA. CONCLUSION: The study showed no statistically significant differences in complications between IBBR patients with or without LYMPHA, indicating that LYMPHA does not increase postoperative risks.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P5. Impact Of Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach (LYMPHA) On Postoperative Complication Rates In Immediate Prosthetic Based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2024
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.