Longitudinal study of neurochemical, volumetric and behavioral changes in Q140 & BACHD mouse models of Huntington’s disease
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Brain metabolites, detectable by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), have been examined as potential biomarkers in Huntington’s Disease (HD). In this study, the RQ140 and BACHD transgenic mouse models of HD were used to investigate the relative sensitivity of the metabolite profiling and the brain volumetry to characterize mouse HD. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 1H MRS data were acquired at 9.4 T from the transgenic mice and wild-type littermates every 3 months until death. Brain shrinkage was detectable in striatum of both mouse models at 12 months compared to littermates. In Q140 mice, increases in PCr and Gln occurred in striatum prior to cortex. Myo-inositol was significantly elevated in both regions from an early age. Lac, Ala and PE decreased in Q140 striatum. Tau increased in Q140 cortex. Metabolite changes in the BACHD cortex and striatum were minimal with a striatal decrease in Lac being most prominent, consistent with a dearth of ubiquitin and 1C2 positive aggregates detected in those regions. Binary logistical regression models generated from the Q140 metabolite data were able to predict the presence of disease in the BACHD striatal and previously published R6/2 metabolite data. Thus, neurochemical changes precede volume shrinkage and become potential biomarkers for HD mouse models Introduction
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Longitudinal study of neurochemical, volumetric and behavioral changes in Q140 & BACHD mouse models of Huntington’s disease
- Date Crossref
- 21/02/2024
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.