Completely Free from PAM Limitations: Asymmetric RPA with CRISPR/Cas12a for Nucleic Acid Assays
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Experimentally, Cas12a can recognize multiple protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences and is not restricted to the “TTTN”. However, the application of the CRISPR/Cas12a system is still limited by the PAM for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Here, we developed asymmetric RPA (Asy-RPA) to completely break the limitations of PAM. Asy-RPA not only achieved efficient amplification but also converted dsDNA to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) without complicated steps. The ssDNA products activated the trans -cleavage activity of Cas12a, outputting signals. The application of Asy-RPA completely freed Cas12a from the PAM, which can be more widely used in nucleic acid detection, such as lumpy skin disease virus, with an actual detection limit as low as 1.21 × 10 1 copies·μL –1 . More importantly, Cas12a was intolerant to mutations on ssDNA. This provided technical support for the detection and identification of wild-type Mycobacterium tuberculosis (WT-TB) and rifampin-resistant mutant-type M. tuberculosis (MT-TB). The detection limit was as low as 1 fM for 1% mixed samples. The detection and availability of different treatment options for treatment-resistant and WT-TB were significant for the elimination of TB. In summary, the platform consisting of Asy-RPA and CRISPR/Cas12a was suitable for the detection of various viruses and bacteria and was a boon for the detection of dsDNA without recognizable PAM.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Completely Free from PAM Limitations: Asymmetric RPA with CRISPR/Cas12a for Nucleic Acid Assays
- Date Crossref
- 27/11/2023
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.