Generating synthetic data from administrative health records for drug safety and effectiveness studies
Rattachement africain : ca, se, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Administrative health records (AHRs) are used to conduct population-based post-market drug safety and comparative effectiveness studies to inform healthcare decision making. However, the cost of data extraction, and the challenges associated with privacy and securing approvals can make it challenging for researchers to conduct methodological research in a timely manner using real data. Generating synthetic AHRs that reasonably represent the real-world data are beneficial for developing analytic methods and training analysts to rapidly implement study protocols. We generated synthetic AHRs using two methods and compared these synthetic AHRs to real-world AHRs. We described the challenges associated with using synthetic AHRs for real-world study. Methods: The real-world AHRs comprised prescription drug records for individuals with healthcare insurance coverage in the Population Research Data Repository (PRDR) from Manitoba, Canada for the 10-year period from 2008 to 2017. Synthetic data were generated using the Observational Medical Dataset Simulator II (OSIM2) and a modification (ModOSIM). Synthetic and real-world data were described using frequencies and percentages. Agreement of prescription drug use measures in PRDR, OSIM2 and ModOSIM was estimated with the concordance coefficient. Results: The PRDR cohort included 169,586,633 drug records and 1,395 drug types for 1,604,734 individuals. Synthetic data for 1,000,000 individuals were generated using OSIM2 and ModOSIM. Sex and age group distributions were similar in the real-world and synthetic AHRs. However, there were significant differences in the number of drug records and number of unique drugs per person for OSIM2 and ModOSIM when compared with PRDR. For the average number of days of drug use, concordance with the PRDR was 16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12%-19%) for OSIM2 and 88% (95% CI: 87%-90%) for ModOSIM. Conclusions: ModOSIM data were more similar to PRDR than OSIM2 data on many measures. Synthetic AHRs consistent with those found in real-world settings can be generated using ModOSIM. Synthetic data will benefit rapid implementation of methodological studies and data analyst training.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Generating synthetic data from administrative health records for drug safety and effectiveness studies
- Date Crossref
- 27/11/2023
- Éditeur
- Swansea University
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Manitoba Department of Community Health Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
McGill University Department of Epidemiology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Manitoba Health pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Université de Montréal Department of Mathematics and Statistics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Karolinska Institutet Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Australian National University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College of Health & Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Community Health Sciences — University of Manitoba, Department of Epidemiology — McGill University et Manitoba Health, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.