Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2023 article

Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract When two previously fit and well staff from a wildlife rescue centre were hospitalised in early September 2018 with severe pneumonia and meningitis symptoms, the Health Protection Team began an investigation. Possible diagnoses included influenza and legionella, although it was not flu season, and initial testing proved negative. There were reports of other staff illness over the preceding weeks. The centre had accepted a wide range species over the Summer, including high numbers of gulls and pigeons, and an outbreak of psittacosis was suspected; the patients responded rapidly to doxycycline. An incident management team was rapidly convened to investigate and determine control measures. A testing algorithm was developed: including for Influenza A&B, Urine legionella & pneumococcal antigen; reference laboratory serology testing and real-time PCR for Chlamydia.psittaci; and pan-corona viruses. Case finding was conducted by telephone interviews and a select-survey of all 55 staff gained 46 responses. A series of site visits examined working practices at the site. Avian and environmental sampling was undertaken. A total of 22 staff met the agreed case definition for psittacosis, five of whom were later confirmed. Clinical features ranged from mild to severe. The onset dates of illness ranged from July to September. There was no evidence of person-to-person transmission. Analysis did not show a clear correlation between PPE use and illness. Clinical, microbiological, environmental, veterinary, and epidemiological evidence indicated zoonotic transmission of psittacosis. Variable compliance with PPE, hygiene when handling birds, and disinfection had likely contributed via aerosolization of dust. This was likely exacerbated by very high bird stocks and unusually warm weather conditions. Comprehensive recommendations were made to reduce the chances of future outbreaks, which are generalisable to other countries. Key messages • This was one of the largest clusters of human psittacosis described in a workplace in England. • Biosecurity in animal rescue centres is crucial to limit the chance of psittacosis and other zoonoses.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre
Date Crossref
01/10/2023
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • South East Region pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • Field Services pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • APHA pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • Environmental Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • East Sussex Hospitals Trust Microbiology pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé

East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, South East Region et Field Services, avec 3 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Viral Infections and VectorsRabies epidemiology and controlMicrobial infections and disease research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.