Senior Technology Learning Preferences Model for Mobile Technology
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Far more older adults are using mobile devices now than a decade ago. However, the applications they use continue to lag in depth (features) and breadth (diversity). Despite the large body of research on designing technology with older adults and identifying their adoption difficulties, we know little about how older users prefer to learn or troubleshoot mobile technology following an initial adoption and ownership. In this paper, we first review the existing models of technology adoption by older adults that consider learning as a factor and discuss their limitations. Then we interview older adults who use mobile technology (n = 23) and younger adults who help them (n = 17), to identify how older adults prefer to learn and troubleshoot nowadays. Our participants represent three different cultures, North American, South Asian, and Middle Eastern. Findings suggest that in addition to mobile device proficiency, older adults' technology identity---different from their attitude toward technology---determines their learning preferences. We identify two types of learning preferences: self-exploration and social learning, and two types of support, general and social. Social support plays a role in both social learning and learning by self-exploration. Finally, we propose the senior technology learning preferences model for mobile technology (STELE) to describe how different learning preferences and support types influence older adults' mobile technology acceptance and use.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Senior Technology Learning Preferences Model for Mobile Technology
- Date Crossref
- 11/09/2023
- Éditeur
- Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Illinois Chicago pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Illinois at Chicago pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
University of Illinois Chicago et University of Illinois at Chicago.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.