Mouse primary follicles experience slow growth rates after activation and progressive increases that influence the duration of the primary follicle phase

Le résumé fourni par la source

There are conflicting estimates of the duration of mouse primary follicle development. An accurate determination is needed for studies examining preantral follicle survival and mathematical modeling of folliculogenesis. Primary follicle granulosa cell proliferation rates are low and variable, which may explain the variation in duration estimates. In the present study, female C57Bl6/J mice were exposed to bromodeoxyuridine for 48 hours, to label the proliferating granulosa cells in a large proportion of primary follicles. The bromodeoxyuridine-containing water was then withdrawn and replaced with drug-free water and the mice were euthanized at 0, 1, 3, 6, 10, or 13 days post-bromodeoxyuridine withdrawal. Granulosa cells were bromodeoxyuridine labeled in 48% of primary follicles at day 0, but this decreased to 5% over the 13-day period, as the labeled primary follicles progressed to the secondary follicle stage. Curve-fitting estimated that the last of the bromodeoxyuridine-labeled primary follicles would progress to the secondary stage by 13.7 days. Mathematical models that assumed constant rates of primary follicle proliferation were fitted to the data, but the observed pattern of bromodeoxyuridine-labeled primary follicle disappearance could not be replicated. The level of immunoreactivity for bromodeoxyuridine and proliferating-cell nuclear antigen in primary follicles revealed follicles with no granulosa cell proliferation during the 48-h bromodeoxyuridine-exposure period had resumed proliferation 1 or 3 days later. Therefore, primary follicle granulosa cells proliferate after follicle activation, but proliferation rates gradually increase as the follicle develops. Prior estimates of primary follicle duration are inaccurate due to the assumption that follicles develop at a constant rate.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.