Reviewer #1 (Public Review): Evolution of a Functionally Intact but Antigenically Distinct DENV Fusion Loop
Le résumé fourni par la source
A hallmark of Dengue virus (DENV) pathogenesis is the potential for antibody-dependent enhancement, which is associated with deadly DENV secondary infection, complicates the identification of correlates of protection, and negatively impacts the safety and efficacy of DENV vaccines. Antibody-dependent enhancement is linked to antibodies targeting the fusion loop (FL) motif of the envelope protein, which is completely conserved in mosquito-borne flaviviruses and required for viral entry and fusion. In the current study, we utilized saturation mutagenesis and directed evolution to engineer a functional variant with a mutated fusion-loop (D2-FL) which is not neutralized by fusion-loop-targeting monoclonal antibodies. The fusion-loop mutations were combined with our previously evolved pre-membrane cleavage site to create a mature version of D2-FL (D2-FLM), which evades both pre-membrane and fusion-loop antibodies but retains sensitivity to other type-specific and quaternary cross-reactive antibodies. Cross-reactive serum from heterotypic (DENV4) infected non-human primates showed lower neutralization titers against D2-FL and D2-FLM than isogenic wildtype DENV2 while similar neutralization titers were observed in serum from homotypic (DENV2) infected non-human primates. We propose D2-FL and D2-FLM as valuable tools to delineate cross-reactive antibody subtypes in serum as well as an exciting platform for safer live attenuated DENV vaccines suitable for naïve individuals and children.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Reviewer #1 (Public Review): Evolution of a Functionally Intact but Antigenically Distinct DENV Fusion Loop
- Date Crossref
- 12/07/2023
- Éditeur
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Type
- peer-review
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.