Regional anaesthesia practices: insights from a European survey
Rattachement africain : fr, at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: The use of regional anaesthesia has increased and evolved over the past two decades but to what extent is unclear. Moreover, there is no clear standardisation of best practice in the current European landscape, which could result in inconsistencies in regional anaesthesia in practice. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this survey was to explore regional anaesthesia practices across Europe, including the differences in procedures, use of ultrasound, reporting of complications, guidelines, training and patient safety implementation. DESIGN: [neuraxial device connectors that meet the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) requirements]. SETTINGS: The survey was disseminated across several European countries via professional networks. PARTICIPANTS: There were 794 respondents from 36 European countries. RESULTS: The survey demonstrated that use of regional anaesthesia is growing in Europe and is supported by new technologies. Although some results are consistent with expected trends and applications (e.g. procedures predominantly performed by anaesthesiologists), there are inconsistencies in practice across European countries, especially in the specific regional anaesthesia procedures utilised for different clinical applications and the recording and reporting of regional anaesthesia complications. These inconsistencies also extended to which guidelines are primarily followed and how training is implemented. There were also variations in the general awareness and uptake of the ISO standard for NRFit. CONCLUSION: The survey results highlight a clear need for standardisation and consistency in the use and management of regional anaesthesia across Europe. The faculty put forth several calls to action that could provide major steps in the right direction towards meeting that goal, including the establishment of European best practices, development of a complication reporting system and implementation of educational programmes to highlight the importance of NRFit.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Regional anaesthesia practices: insights from a European survey
- Date Crossref
- 03/07/2023
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Medical University of Vienna pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
From the University Medical Centre pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (https://journals.lww.com/ejaintensivecare) pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
to Arjan Konijn pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Medical University of Vienna et From the University Medical Centre, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.