Non-crystalline light chain proximal tubulopathy, a morphologically protean entity

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Light chain proximal tubulopathy (LCPT) is a rare form of paraprotein-related disease, occurring in two main histopathological forms: crystalline and non-crystalline. The clinicopathological features, treatment strategies and outcomes, especially of the non-crystalline form, are not well described. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective case series of 12 LCPT patients, 5 crystalline and 7 non-crystalline, between 2005 and 2021. RESULTS: The median age was 69.5 years (range 47-80). Ten patients presented with CKD and significant proteinuria (median estimated glomerular filtration rate of 43.5 ml/min/1.73 m2; urine protein:creatinine ratio 328 mg/mmol). Only six patients had known haematological disease at the time of renal biopsy. Multiple myeloma (MM) was diagnosed in seven patients cases and monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) in five patients. A clone was detected in all cases combining serum/urine electrophoresis and free light chain (LC) assays. Crystalline and non-crystalline variants had similar clinical presentations. For the non-crystalline variant, a diagnosis was reached based on a combination of CKD without another cause, haematological workup, LC restriction on immunofluorescence and abnormalities on electron microscopy (EM). Nine of 12 patients received clone-directed treatment. Patients who achieved haematological response (including all non-crystalline LCPT) had improved renal outcomes over a median follow-up of 79 months. CONCLUSIONS: The non-crystalline variant may go unrecognised because of its subtle histopathological features and requires EM to distinguish it from 'excessive LC resorption without tubular injury'. Clone-directed treatment with good haematological response improves renal outcomes in both variants but limited data exist in MGRS. Multicentre prospective studies are needed to better define the clinicopathological characteristics associated with poor outcomes and optimize treatment strategies in patients with MGRS.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.