Data Supplement from Targeted Deletion and Lipidomic Analysis Identify Epithelial Cell COX-2 as a Major Driver of Chemically Induced Skin Cancer
Le résumé fourni par la source
Papillomas developed on Cox-2deltaE mice have a significantly increased percentage of small vessels and a significantly decreased percentage of (medium-sized + large-sized) vessels when compared to papillomas from littermate control Cox-2fl/fl mice. Vessel size analysis was performed with the Definiens' Tissue Studio program to determine vessel sizes from papillomas (n = 9) from Cox-2deltaE mice, papillomas (n = 19) from their littermate Cox-2fl/fl mice, papillomas (n = 9) from Cox-2deltaM mice, and papillomas (n = 10) from their Cox-2fl/fl littermate mice. Parameters were set to distinguish small vessels (<100µm2), medium-sized vessels (100-1000µm2), and large vessels (>1000µm2). The graph shows the vessel size distribution of small, medium-sized and large vessels in papillomas from each of the four cohorts. The percentage of small vessels in papillomas of Cox-2deltaE mice was significantly increased when compared to the percentage of small vessels in papillomas of their Cox-2fl/fl littermates (p = 0.003), and the percentage of (medium-sized + large vessels) was correspondingly reduced (p = 0.002). In contrast, vessel size distribution did not differ for papillomas from Cox-2deltaM mice and their Cox-2fl/fl littermates. Data were analyzed using an unpaired Student's t test. Error bars are SD. * indicates p<0.05.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Data Supplement from Targeted Deletion and Lipidomic Analysis Identify Epithelial Cell COX-2 as a Major Driver of Chemically Induced Skin Cancer
- Date Crossref
- 03/04/2023
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.