Optimizing COVID-19 testing strategies on college campuses: evaluation of the health and economic costs
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Colleges and universities in the US struggled to provide safe in-person education throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Testing coupled with isolation is a nimble intervention strategy that can be tailored to mitigate health and economic costs, as the virus and our arsenal of medical countermeasures continue to evolve. We developed a decision-support tool to aid in the design of university-based testing strategies using a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Applying this framework to a large public university reopening in the fall of 2021 with a 60% student vaccination rate, we find that the optimal strategy, in terms of health and economic costs, is twice weekly antigen testing of all students. This strategy provides a 95% guarantee that, throughout the fall semester, case counts would not exceed the CDC’s original high transmission threshold of 100 cases per 100k persons over 7 days. As the virus and our medical armament continue to evolve, testing will remain a flexible tool for managing risks and keeping campuses open. We have implemented this model as an online tool to facilitate the design of testing strategies that adjust for COVID-19 conditions, university-specific parameters, and institutional goals. Author Summary As a part of the COVID-19 response team at a large public university in the US, we performed an analysis that considered together, the potential health and economic costs of different testing policies for the student body. University administrators had to weigh the up-front effort needed to implement wide scale testing against the potential costs of responding to high levels of disease on campus in the Fall of 2021, after vaccines were widely available but vaccination rates among college students were uncertain. The results presented here are applied to this specific instance, but the online tool provided can be tailored to university specific parameters, the epidemiological conditions, and the goals of the university. As we confront newly emerging variants of COVID-19 or novel pathogens, consideration of both the health and economic costs of proactive testing may serve as a politically tractable and cost-effective disease mitigation strategy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Optimizing COVID-19 testing strategies on college campuses: evaluation of the health and economic costs
- Date Crossref
- 05/12/2022
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Rockefeller Foundation pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
The University of Texas at Austin Department of Integrative Biology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Santa Fe Institute pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
University of Georgia Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
The Pandemic Prevention Institute pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Yale School of Public Health Public Health Modeling Unit pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Rockefeller Foundation, Department of Integrative Biology — The University of Texas at Austin et Santa Fe Institute, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.