Pseudomonas species may appear strikingly filamentous in tissue sections: an important consideration for surgical pathologists and a reminder of the utility of modified silver impregnation methods

Le résumé fourni par la source

Although tissue culture is the gold standard for diagnosing infection, histologic examination of surgically resected tissue can be a critical component in the diagnosis of tissue infection. The goal of this brief report is to alert surgical pathologists that Pseudomonas species can appear strikingly filamentous histologically and may somewhat mimic the appearance of filamentous bacteria, such Actinomyces or Nocardia, or thin fungal hyphae. A secondary aim is to raise awareness that Pseudomonas can sometimes only be identified histologically through the use of a modified silver impregnation method (Steiner stain). Five cases of filamentous Pseudomonas were encountered in three different surgical pathology subspecialities (ophthalmic pathology, cardiovascular pathology, and dermatopathology) over a 1-year period. All cases were of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, stained using hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and multiple histochemical stains. Four cases grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa in culture and, in the fifth case, a nonaeruginosa species was detected using polymerase chain reaction-based methods. The markedly filamentous-appearing Pseudomonas organisms were identified in five different tissue sites: vascular graft, enucleation (whole eye) specimen, scleral biopsy, soft-tissue excision, and skin punch biopsy. In one of the five cases the organisms were seen on H&E, and in only two of the five were the organisms seen on Brown-Hopps stain. In all five cases, the organisms were identified on Steiner stain. It is therefore important to recognize that Pseudomonas can appear markedly filamentous, Pseudomonas or other bacterial infection is suspected, the surgical pathologist would be advised to employ the Steiner stain to most consistently detect the organisms.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.