Improving Vitamin D Screening in a Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic Using Structured Quality Improvement Process
Rattachement africain : us, ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Monitoring levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) is an integral part of bone health assessment in the general pediatric population, especially in at-risk populations such as children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE), and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). However, only 38% of the patients with JIA, c-SLE, and JDM receiving care at Nationwide Children's Hospital Rheumatology clinic in 2016 had a 25-OHD level ordered in the preceding year. The objective of this project was to increase the percentage of 25-OHD levels ordered in patients with JIA, c-SLE, and JDM from 38% to 80% in 11 months and sustain it for 6 months. Methods: A multidisciplinary team initiated a continuous improvement project utilizing the Lean Six Sigma methodology. The team diagrammed the clinical process and identified steps that needed improvement. In addition, the team completed a root cause analysis of the process and brainstormed subsequent countermeasures. Results: value 0.001). The level was sustained after the study period, with 68% of these children having a 25-OHD level ordered. Conclusion: The team successfully improved the screening processes for vitamin D deficiency in a busy subspecialty clinic setting using Lean Six Sigma methodology.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Improving Vitamin D Screening in a Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic Using Structured Quality Improvement Process
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2022
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.