An Association of CSF Apolipoprotein E glycosylation and amyloid-beta 42 in individuals who carry the APOE4 allele
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Carrying the Apolipoprotein E (apoE) ε4 allele is associated with an increased risk of cerebral amyloidosis, but the degree to which apoE glycosylation affects its development is not clear. In a previous pilot study, we identified distinct total and secondary isoform-specific cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) apoE glycosylation profiles, with the apoE4 isoform having the lowest glycosylation percentage (E2 > E3 > E4). In this work, we extend the analysis to a larger cohort of individuals (n = 106), utilizing matched plasma and CSF samples with clinical measures of AD biomarkers. The results confirm the isoform-specific glycosylation of apoE in CSF, resulting from secondary CSF apoE glycosylation patterns. CSF apoE glycosylation percentages positively correlated with CSF Aβ42 levels (r = 0.53, p < 0.0001). These correlations were not observed for plasma apoE glycosylation. CSF total and secondary apoE glycosylation percentages also correlated with the concentration of CSF small high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles which we have previously shown to be correlated with CSF Aβ42 levels and measures of cognitive function. Desialylation of apoE3 purified from CSF showed increased binding affinity to heparin. These results indicate that apoE glycosylation has a new and important role in influencing brain Aβ metabolism and can be a potential target of treatment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An Association of CSF Apolipoprotein E glycosylation and amyloid-beta 42 in individuals who carry the APOE4 allele
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2022
- Éditeur
- Research Square Platform LLC
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.