International comparison CCQM-K165: dimethyl sulfide in nitrogen at 5 nmol mol-1
Rattachement africain : kr, cn, gb, ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Main text Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is produced mainly by the metabolic activities of oceanic phytoplankton and the most abundant natural sulfur compound in the atmosphere. DMS plays an important role for climate change since it is oxidized and forms sulfate aerosols in the atmosphere, affecting the Earth's radiation budget directly and indirectly. DMS is designated as one of the target reactive gases and monitored in the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) programme. It is important to accurately monitor its global background levels with SI traceability for better understanding of the role of DMS in climate change. This comparison is organized by Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS). Gas mixtures gravimetrically prepared by KRISS are used for demonstrating measurement equivalence at the highest metrological level. This comparison (Track C) is designed to underpin participants' measurement capabilities of trace level DMS in nitrogen at the nominal amount fraction of 5 nmol mol-1. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- International comparison CCQM-K165: dimethyl sulfide in nitrogen at 5 nmol mol<sup>-1</sup>
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2022
- Éditeur
- IOP Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.