Psychiatry and Covid-19: Acute mental health presentations before and during the pandemic
Le résumé fourni par la source
BackgroundWe aimed to analyse numbers and types of psychiatric presentations to inform planning for future demand on mental health services in light of the Covid-19 pandemic. MethodsWe analysed electronic data between January and April 2020 for 2,534 patients referred to acute psychiatric services. We used interrupted time series analyses to compare trends in A&E and psychiatric presentations before and after lockdown, and tested for differences in patients’ demographics, symptom severity, and use of the Mental Health Act, before and after lockdown.ResultsThere were 11% fewer psychiatric presentations the first week and 64% fewer A&E presentations the first month after lockdown initiated. A higher proportion of patients were detained under the Mental Health Act (22.2% vs 16.1%) and Mental Capacity Act (2.2 vs 1.1%)(χ2(2)=16.3, p<0.0001) and they experienced a longer duration of symptoms before seeking help from mental health services (χ 2(3)= 18.6, p<0.0001). A higher proportion of patients presented with psychotic symptoms (23.3% v 17.0%) or delirium (7.0 v 3.6%) and fewer had parasuicidal behaviour (43.8% v 52.0, χ2 (7)= 28.7, p<0.0001). A higher proportion were admitted to psychiatric inpatient units (22.2% vs 18.3%) (χ 2(6)= 42.8, p<0.0001) after lockdownConclusions UK lockdown resulted in fewer psychiatric presentations but those who presented were more likely to have severe symptoms, be detained under the Mental Health Act and admitted to hospital. Psychiatric services should ensure provision of care for these patients as well as planning for those affected by future COVID-19 waves.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Psychiatry and Covid-19: Acute mental health presentations before and during the pandemic
- Date Crossref
- 26/11/2020
- Éditeur
- Center for Open Science
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.