Effects of Early Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study
Le résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) among high-risk neonates and to illuminate the benefits of early treatment in type 2 ROP (zone II, stage 3 without plus) and ROP milder than type 1 with pre-plus disease (zone III, stage 3). Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among 307 high-risk neonates (614 eyes) with a gestational age of 32 weeks or younger at birth and a birth weight of 1,500 g or less, from 2011 to 2016. Treatment was initiated for neonates with low-risk type 2 ROP and ROP milder than type 1 with pre-plus disease, whenever retinopathy was evident for 3 clock hours with or without vitreous hemorrhage. Post-treatment progression was recorded. Results: The prevalence of ROP in the current study was 33.71%. Two hundred seven eyes had ROP; 47.34% had mild retinopathy that did not require treatment, and 52.66% received laser treatment, including the early treated group. Of the 207 eyes with ROP, 46.86% had low-risk type 2 ROP disease and ROP milder than type 1 with pre-plus disease, and underwent photocoagulation therapy. After treatment, 15.38% and 10.71% eyes were stable, 84.62% and 88.10% eyes had regressed retinopathy, and 0% and 1.19% progressed in both groups, respectively. Conclusions: Early treatment of type 2 ROP and ROP milder than type 1 with pre-plus disease in certain cases significantly decreased the rate of progression to more advanced stages and resulted in good clinical outcomes. [ J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus . 2021;58(4):240–245.]
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effects of Early Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2021
- Éditeur
- SLACK, Inc.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.