Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2021 article

Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies

223Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
90Institutions déclarées
55Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : se, us, cn, Ghana, kz, it, ie, tr, ir, Kenya, ar, my, pe, pl, at, ru, vn, co, ba, kr, mx, pt, gb, lk, de, nl, ca, hu, is, cz, am, sk, sg, lv, ua, jp, au, ee, ae, Mozambique, th, sa, il, tt, Nigéria, gr, cl, Botswana, fi, ec, es, Côte d’Ivoire, br, Algérie, id. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Norm enforcement may be important for resolving conflicts and promoting cooperation. However, little is known about how preferred responses to norm violations vary across cultures and across domains. In a preregistered study of 57 countries (using convenience samples of 22,863 students and non-students), we measured perceptions of the appropriateness of various responses to a violation of a cooperative norm and to atypical social behaviors. Our findings highlight both cultural universals and cultural variation. We find a universal negative relation between appropriateness ratings of norm violations and appropriateness ratings of responses in the form of confrontation, social ostracism and gossip. Moreover, we find the country variation in the appropriateness of sanctions to be consistent across different norm violations but not across different sanctions. Specifically, in those countries where use of physical confrontation and social ostracism is rated as less appropriate, gossip is rated as more appropriate.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies
Date Crossref
05/03/2021
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Stockholm UniversityMälardalen UniversityInstitute for Futures StudiesUniversity of Maryland, College ParkChinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of South CarolinaUniversity of GhanaSatbayev UniversityLinköping UniversityNational Research CouncilInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and TechnologiesMälardalen UniversityTrinity College DublinKoç UniversityShahid Beheshti UniversityCollegio Carlo AlbertoUniversity of TurinUnited States International University AfricaKazakh-British Technical UniversityConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasUniversidad Nacional de CórdobaSunway UniversityPontificia Universidad Católica del PerúUniwersytet SWPSUniversität InnsbruckMoscow State University of Psychology & EducationHanoi National University of EducationUniversidad de Los AndesUniversity of Banja LukaSungkyunkwan UniversityUniversidad Autónoma MetropolitanaUniversity of LisbonBrunel University of LondonUniversity of ColomboUniversity of CologneUniversidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de MéxicoUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoUniversity of AmsterdamUniversity of MinnesotaYork UniversityMax Planck Institute for Behavioral EconomicsNew York UniversityEötvös Loránd UniversityInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and PsychologyUniversity of IcelandCzech Academy of SciencesCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of PsychologyYerevan State UniversitySt Petersburg UniversitySlovak Academy of SciencesCentre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of SciencesSingapore Management UniversityUniversity of KentDaugavpils UniversityKyiv International Institute of Sociology (Ukraine)Aoyama Gakuin UniversityUniversity of TrnavaNational Economics UniversityThe University of MelbourneNagoya UniversityWestern UniversityTallinn UniversityAmerican University of SharjahEduardo Mondlane UniversityChulalongkorn UniversityImam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic UniversityOpen University of IsraelUniversity of Trinidad and TobagoUniversity of HaifaUniversity of NigeriaUniversity of PatrasUniversidad Diego PortalesUniversity of BotswanaUniversity of HelsinkiQueen's UniversityIscte – Instituto Universitário de LisboaUniversidad San Francisco de QuitoUniversity of Eastern FinlandIESE Business SchoolKwansei Gakuin UniversityJohannes Kepler University of LinzShiga UniversityUniversité Félix Houphouët-BoignyUniversidade Presbiteriana MackenzieUniversité d'Oran 2Chinese University of Hong Kong, ShenzhenNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAirlangga UniversityGuangzhou UniversityVrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationCultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.