Abstract PS6-51: Identification of a low-risk luminal breast cancer cohort that may not benefit from multi-gene testing
Rattachement africain : us, tw, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Purpose: Dutch clinical risk criteria (low-risk definition: age > 35 years and (grade 1 with tumor ≤3cm, grade 2 with tumor ≤2cm, or grade 3 with tumor ≤1cm) have been used to stratify the benefit of MammaPrint and Oncotype DX for the decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage luminal breast cancer. We propose that the criteria could help to identify low-risk patients who could barely benefit from multi-gene testing. Materials and methods: Breast cancer patients from Taiwan Cancer Database initially treated with primary surgeries between 2008 and 2012 who met the following criteria: (1) pathologic node-negative, (2) hormone receptor-positive, (3) HER2-negative, (4) undergone hormonal therapy, and (5) a minimum follow-up time of 5-year if free from any event, were enrolled in this study. Out of the total 2679 eligible patients, 1074 (40.1%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to endocrine therapy. The study endpoints included breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier statistics estimated the difference between clinical outcomes in low- and high-risk groups. Results: The median follow-up time of BSCC and OS was 5.9 years (range, 0-7 years) and 5.8 years (range, 0-7 years), respectively. There were statistical significances of 5-year BCSS (n=2679) and 5-year OS (n=2636) between low-risk and high-risk groups (in both endpoints, P < 0.0001). According to the Dutch criteria, low-risk patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy had a 5-year BCSS of 99.0% vs. 99.2% and a 5-year OS of 98.4% vs. 97.4%, respectively. High-risk patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy had a 5-year BCSS of 97.7% vs. 98.1% and a 5-year OS of 96.4% vs. 95.3%, respectively. Conclusion: The benefit of chemotherapy in low-risk patients classified by Dutch criteria might be very small since the breast cancer mortality was less than 1% with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Dutch criteria cannot identify high-risk patients who would benefit from chemotherapy. We assumed that multi-gene testing in low-risk patients would not be cost-effective. Citation Format: Lei Lei, Han-Ching Chan, Tzu-Pin Lu, Xian-Yuan Miao, Zi-Yan Yang, Jia-Huan Huang, Xiao-Jia Wang, Hung-Chun Skye Cheng. Identification of a low-risk luminal breast cancer cohort that may not benefit from multi-gene testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS6-51.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Abstract PS6-51: Identification of a low-risk luminal breast cancer cohort that may not benefit from multi-gene testing
- Date Crossref
- 15/02/2021
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Pellissippi State Community College pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
National Taiwan University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Jackson pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Taipei pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Hangzhou pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Pellissippi State Community College, National Taiwan University et Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, avec 5 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.