Enhanced Anti-Amyloid Effect of Combined Leptin and Pioglitazone in APP/PS1 Transgenic Mice
Rattachement africain : au, gb, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) has challenged single-target therapeutic strategies, raising the possibility that combined therapies may offer a more effective treatment strategy. OBJECTIVE: There is substantial evidence for the efficacy of leptin (L) (neuroprotective hormone) and pioglitazone (P) (anti-inflammatory agent) as monotherapies in AD. We have previously shown that combination treatment of L+P in APP/PS1 mice at the onset of pathology significantly improved memory and reduced brain Aβ levels relative to control mice. In this new study, we sought to replicate our previous findings in a new cohort of APP/PS1 mice to further confirm whether the combined treatment of L+P is superior to each treatment individually. METHODS: We have re-evaluated the effects of L+P co-treatment in APP/PS1 mice using thioflavin-S staining, MOAβ immunolabeling, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to examine effects on Aβ levels and pathology, relative to animals that received L or P individually. RESULTS: We demonstrated that a combination of L and P significantly enhances the anti-Aβ effect of L or P in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that combining L and P significantly enhances the anti-Aβ effect of L or P in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice and maybe a potential new effective strategy for AD therapy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Enhanced Anti-Amyloid Effect of Combined Leptin and Pioglitazone in APP/PS1 Transgenic Mice
- Date Crossref
- 05/03/2021
- Éditeur
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.