A novel mathematical approach to estimate the hepatic, cerebral and renal blood flow from dynamic nuclear imaging studies independently of the used radio tracer

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background The blood flow (BF) is a critical determinant of organ functionality. Its assessment in the course of routine nuclear medicine examinations, including planar scintigraphy and positron emission tomography (PET), can be relevant for the diagnosis and monitoring of various conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate a new mathematical approach developed to estimate the organ BF from dynamic imaging data and to analyze if this method can be applied independent of the used radio tracer or imaging modality. The new approach uses the early phase of time activity curves extracted from animal and human dynamic scintigraphy and PET scans. Independence of tracer characteristics was evaluated with major oxygen-dependent organs (kidneys, liver, brain) of a mouse model. The approach was also applied on renal scans with two different imaging modalities from a representative cohort of 32 human subjects and compared to reference values. Results The mean organ-specific BF determined in the mouse model revealed no significant differences between the administered radiotracers and all calculated values corresponded to normal values (kidneys: 1.0-1.1 ml/min, liver: 1.4–1.6 ml/min, brain: 0.2 ml/min). In the human study cohort, the renal BFs from the two performed imaging modalities showed a good correlation (r = 0.61, p = 0.001) and a small significant difference (p = 0.047) among each other and good correlations to the reference value obtained from blood sampling (r = 0.79 and r = 0.52). Conclusions A mathematical approach was developed to assess the organ BF solely from dynamic imaging scans without the necessity of additional measurements. Preliminary data suggests that several radiotracers might be feasible to estimate the BF in major oxygen-dependent organs.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.