Hypotonic challenge reduces human sperm motility through coiling and folding of the tail
Rattachement africain : se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Human ejaculates collected for in vitro procedures show variably rapid increases in osmolality, depending on enzymatic degradation of compounds. Changes in osmolality can affect cell functions due to the energy consuming processes needed to control cell volume. The aim was to examine the effects of a hypotonic challenge for spermatozoa exposed to increased osmolality. Spermatozoa were selected by density gradient centrifugation and washed in media with different osmolalities. Osmolality was measured by freezing-point depression and sperm velocities by CASA. Swimming pattern observations and assessments of tail morphology of fixed spermatozoa were done with phase contrast microscopy. Increased osmolality did not change the curvilinear velocity (VCL), while decreased osmolality reduced or abolished VCL nonreversibly. For spermatozoa first exposed to 400 mOsm/kg, reversal of osmolality to 290 mOsm/kg reduced the VCL and the average path velocity (VAP) permanently. Hypotonic challenges increased sperm tail coiling and folding in a dose-response pattern. Spermatozoa once adjusted to high osmolality in the liquefied ejaculate are likely to suffer if exposed to a medium with a lower osmolality. For improved success of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART), it appears to be important to minimise the duration of sperm exposure to the ejaculate, by early dilution or sperm preparation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Hypotonic challenge reduces human sperm motility through coiling and folding of the tail
- Date Crossref
- 07/10/2020
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.